Web Awareness is definitely one of the most significant topics to discuss in the realm of the Internet, especially in school with students. I believe it is the role of the school to develop character in students as they engage in both online and offline worlds. Schools should strive to foster good character in students that is consistent when interacting with people face-to-face or behind a computer.

When I did my ED2500 in a kindergarten classroom, my teacher associate emphasized how important it was to teach students manners, respect, and good attitude. She explained how such lessons would be essential building blocks for students’ social skills and perspectives towards learning as they progress through school. I definitely agree with her and took any opportunity in her classroom to encourage and exemplify good character. I remember one student in particular who had a very difficult time sharing toys with her peers. She would upset her friends with her temper and criticism which often left her alone and ignored. One day, she came to me to ask how to approach her problem. She knew she had to apologize and was seeking the courage and humility to do so. I remember as I watched her approach her friends, how vital such lessons beyond the textbook are. I strongly believe building character is at the heart of our role as educators- students can learn all they want in our classrooms, but if they are not shown how to act with personal values and morals, I fear we may not have achieved our role. While fostering character in students may be simpler in face-to-face interactions, it is very challenging in the online world where people can be anonymous and engage in questionable activities that can’t be monitored easily. This is where teaching students digital citizenship and web awareness is critical.

The first way to do this is by having teachers model and exemplify expected behavior in their classrooms. I genuinely believe the saying ‘actions speak louder than words’ illuminates how students approach digital citizenship and web awareness. If the school has a no cellphone policy and students see their teacher texting under his/her desk during seatwork time, then they will take to their teacher’s example and start texting themselves. The same goes with teachers checking personal email in school or surfing pages unrelated to work during class. Such behavior only encourages students to be unmindful of the people around them and distracted in learning.

Something that got my interest from the Web awareness interview with Dr. Robin Bright and Dr. Mary Dyck was the concept of multitasking. In a study from Stanford University, research shows that “the skill needed to maximally multitask may have a downside as individuals may not be able to filter irrelevant information or stay on task”. The study showed how heavy multitaskers do not function as effectively as light multitaskers in recalling, storing, and organizing information.

This definitely has implications for the classroom for students who multitask. A source in the article claims that such students “couldn’t help thinking about the task they weren’t doing” and that “high multitaskers are always drawing from all the information in front of them. They can’t keep things separate in their minds.” Here is a video that discusses how multitasking short-circuits important intellectual processes in learning:
Another aspect of web awareness is the filtering of Internet content within the school. I believe that the standards of filtering should differ for each division. For the younger grades (K-3), it is important to remember that students may not have the capability to critically evaluate the information they come across which includes the inappropriate, offensive, and harmful. Therefore, I understand why elementary schools would have Internet restrictions. For higher grade levels, however, I strongly believe schools should focus on the development of ethical digital citizens, otherwise, students will never learn how to be responsible online participants in an increasingly digital world. Developing digital citizenship can be incorporated in classrooms through weekly lessons that can focus on topics such as web awareness, cyber bullying, privacy, digital footprints, etc.  This is something I plan to integrate in my own classroom, especially in higher grades so that students can understand how impactful their online activities truly are. Just as we teach students to be culturally and globally aware of things around them, web awareness is something of equal importance to foster in the classroom as well. 

References:
Grohol, John M. August 27, 2009. Excess Multitasking has Downside. August 27 2009. Retrieved July 18 2013 from http://psychcentral.com/news/2009/08/27/excess-multi-tasking-has-downside/8013.html

Why the Human Brain Can't Multitask. Retrieved July 18 2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpD3PxrgICU

Significant Comments:
http://nordleeblog.weebly.com/1/post/2013/07/topic-8-web-awareness-i.html#comments (Stephanie)
http://alanasinternetandeducationsite.weebly.com/1/post/2013/07/web-awareness-pt-1.html#comments (Alana)
 
In the English Language Arts Alberta Program of Studies, one out of the five main general learning outcomes is for students to "respect, support, and collaborate with others" as shown in this image below:

(Click on image for larger version)

Collaboration is definitely not just a method for learning but an outcome to achieve so educators should gain awareness for the tools available.

One of the tools for collaboration and communication that I’ve experienced recently is Google Hangout. Hangout is a free video chat service for both one-on-one and group chats with up to ten people at time. This tool can most definitely be used between students to collaborate and discuss a group assignment outside of classroom time, benefiting students with limited schedules who may be heavily involved in extracurricular activities, sports, or work part-time. I feel using Google Hangout would be most advantageous for students to connect with other people beyond their classroom, rather than between themselves who are already physically together in a space. Hangout can be used by one classroom of students to collaborate with another classroom on a specific topic. An example that comes to mind is the one Jen Dyenberg described with her Social Studies activity. She got her students to connect and collaborate with a class from Hamilton on the topic of urban vs. rural environments in Canada. When I get an opportunity to do such an activity with another teacher from a different area, we would split our classes into groups of 10 students and have them collaborate in small groups by providing them with a list of questions to discuss. This would allow for more conversation between the students and more variety of responses. Afterwards, my class can summarize what they had learned in their small groups with the whole class.

If a Google Hangout is not organized as a private meeting between specific people, it could invite inappropriate or unwanted company. Privacy concerns such as this are the biggest risks I can see with this tool. Also, the credibility of information and ideas from people in Hangouts can be questionable. Despite such considerationshowever, I find Google Hangout highly appropriate for elementary, junior high, and senior high students, provided it is used effectively and parents of students under the age of 13 are informed through a release form that requires their consent. For elementary students, I would use Google Hangout as a means for students to meet and connect with a pen pal they may have been writing/e-mailing to. For junior high students taking French class for example, Google Hangout can be used to meet other French-speaking classrooms from a different country. Senior High students would greatly benefit from Google Hangout by connecting with professionals from different fields to explore career options.

An article I found on Collaborative Learning by Bower & Richards state that “collaborative learning has become recognised as a means of encouraging deep learning and a key technique in problem and experienced based learning”. I was very curious to see how beneficial collaboration is versus independent learning and this article provided great insights. The following list is my summary of the main arguments for collaboration from Bower & Richards’ work:

Collaborative learning allows students to:

Progress beyond what they would have been able to learn alone by sharing mental models and observing the thought processes of others.

Actively participate in problem solving processes by communicating about the conceptual representations relating to the task at hand. 

Interact effectively for rapid and complex concept formation to occur 

Develop a range of generic skills benefits, including the development of general communication abilities, empathy, and social skills. 

Develop teamwork skills demanded by many employers today.

I agree with these points from the article, especially with my experiences of collaborative activities as a student. A particular experience I had was when I took a Senior English university course and had to work with a group of 3 people to develop a 1500 word essay. We used Google Docs and saved so much time posting our essay on a shared server where everyone can access it and edit it at the same time or at their own time with no need to keep track of which version we were working on or who has the latest version.  Using collaboration tools like this can definitely help teachers and administrators working together in their professional development projects and I look forward to discovering other tools for my classroom!

References:
Bower, Matt & Debbie Richards. Collaborative learning: Some possibilities and limitations for students and teachers. 2006. Retrieved July 15 2013 from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p150.pdf

Alberta Program of Studies (English Language Arts Senior High). Retrieved July 15 2013 from http://education.alberta.ca/media/645805/srhelapofs.pdf

Significant Comments:
http://justinbechthold.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/collaboration-outside-of-the-classroom/#comments (Justin) (Note: My comment is under the email address [email protected] I forgot to enter my name... )

http://ed4764blog.weebly.com/1/post/2013/07/topic-7-collaboration.html#comments (Mackenzie)
 
This topic made me realize how far we have come in finding ways to share our ideas and how classrooms extend beyond its walls. I am seeing more clearly how the technologies we have been exploring are means to expand students’ perspectives so they can develop and share their understandings with the world. Publishing tools have definitely enabled this learning outcome and I am astounded by the variety available.

The first thing that came to my mind when I saw the word ‘Publishing’ was blogging which is only one method out of many. I had not thought of Infographics as a means to publish ideas and how it would greatly benefit visual learners in a classroom. I thought of poster-making and how in a way, they are infographs too. However, after creating such physical posters, I notice how easily they get tossed aside or hung forgetfully on a wall. By being digital, infographs are easier to share with others and enable comments to be attached. I am now looking forward to incorporating the exploration and creation of infographics in ELA 20-2 units this Fall. One idea is to have students create infographics on particular themes from texts. This will get them to not just come up with a plot summary, but to also make connections to other texts and the culture around them which is actually a specific learning outcome in the English Language Arts Program of Studies (SLO 2.3.1).

Reading about digital storytelling and exploring the different tools available got me thinking about Bloom’s Taxonomy. While the features of such tools are really nifty and exciting, I was thinking of the higher learning outcomes being achieved with this activity. In Microsoft’s components of digital storytelling, outcomes such as Fosters Critical Thinking Skills, Gives Students a Voice, Helps Students make connections, and Encourages Creativity promote higher order thinking in Bloom’s Taxonomy. Below is a diagram of Bloom’s Taxonomy for reference:

(Click Image for larger version)

Specifically, storytelling enables student to achieve the highest level of thinking with creation. But since this form of storytelling is digital, using other tools to research, analyze, and synthesize information reinforces other aspects of thinking such as Evaluating in Bloom’s. An article I found by Felecia Young highlights this in the following quote:
Integrating technology in the classroom and engaging students in higher order thinking creates the ultimate learning experience for students. Bloom’s Taxonomy and digital tools creates an innovative learning environment where students are engaged in their assignments” - Young
Another source, “Mobile Learning with Blooms Taxonomy and the Pedagogy Wheel” illuminates how digital tools or apps can effective support Bloom’s Taxonomy outcomes. This image (infographic?) below was shown to me by a friend and I have referred to it when considering which tools would work best to achieve an outcome:

(Click Image for larger version)

These sources show how technology, specifically publishing tools, can be used as a medium to achieve learning outcomes which advocates for The Flipped Classroom strongly argue. I believe the Flipped Classroom has benefits for students if technology is used to fit the context and used to achieve learning outcomes, not technology outcomes. For example, a Flipped Classroom approach would be very advantageous for a class of students who have continuous access to technology in their homes- but what about for a group who don’t? Implementing a Flipped Classroom thus requires careful consideration of such contextual variables, otherwise we would we be causing a great disservice in students’ learning. The concept of a Flipped Classroom is definitely something very new to me that I am open to trying out after getting to know my students and their learning needs better. 

References:
Microsoft: Tell a Story, Be a Lifelong Learner. Retrieved July 13 2013 from: http://www.microsoft.com/education/en-us/teachers/guides/Pages/digital_storytelling.aspx

Young, Felecia. 35 Digital Tools That Work With Bloom’s Taxonomy. 28 Nov 2011. Retrieved July 13 2013 from: http://www.edudemic.com/2012/11/35-digital-tools-that-work-with-blooms-taxonomy/?utm_content=bufferbbc28&utm_source=buffer&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=Buffer

Bloom's Taxonomy in a nutshell. Retrieved July 13 2013 from: http://www.chatt.hdsb.ca/~nagjib/?OpenItemURL=S0E369C7B

Pickering, Cherie. Mobile Learning with Blooms Taxonomy and the Pedagogy Wheel. October 2012. Retrieved July 13 2013 from: http://rde.nsw.edu.au/files/UHS_Padagogy_2012.pdf


Significant Comments:http://danoryschak.weebly.com/1/post/2013/07/telecommunications-in-the-classroom.html#comments (Dan O)

http://summerschoolsalmon.weebly.com/1/post/2013/07/publishing.html#comments (Jason)